The Helsinki Accords were signed on August 1, 1975 in Helsinki, Finland (US Department of State). The signatories of this conference include 35 European states, the US, and Canada. The goal of this conference “was to reduce tension between East and West” (New World Encyclopedia, 2014). This diplomatic effort served to lessen tensions from the Cold War as well as boost perceptions of the Soviet Union from the West. This conference included many topics but of particular importance is the section of humanitarian and cultural cooperation. The Soviet Union signing this accord eventually became a stable foundation for the dissident movement.
Sections on human rights featured rhetoric that supported journalistic rights as their profession was reliant on the ability to freely report. There was also talk of cultural inclusion and information to diffuse ideas and beliefs across state boundaries. This was to be done by sending professionals across state boundaries to encourage this diffusion. Another topic referred to minority and ethnic group inclusion as it was imperative to completing the cultural diversity of each state (Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe Final Act, 1975). When the Soviet Union partook in the signing of these accords they agreed to recognize and appreciate humanitarian and cultural rights. This was exemplified in a current digest article that cited the importance of the Accords: “First of all, that the historic Helsinki meeting opened up new horizons in the sphere of cultural exchanges. It goes without saying that this is of enormous importance in the further materialization of detente and in the strengthening of peace” (Pankin, 1975). From a state view, the Soviet Union seemed to be making positive steps in the right direction but a look into the domestic realities painted another picture.
Almost paralleling the accord signing was unrest in Soviet society. “Dissidence arose among Soviet intellectuals in the 1960s and expanded in the early 1970s” (von Geldern, 2015). Movements for the recognition of human rights and more individual freedoms became the foundations of these movements which included public demonstrations, circulation of banned literatures, and publishing of factual journals like the chronical. While these movements never attracted huge numbers of people they represented a powerful and hungry awakening of society. The rise of these movements led to an aggressive reaction from the government. These movements were repressed by physical means such as exile or forced entrance into mental institutions as well as government propaganda (von Geldern, 2015).
The Helsinki accords proposed a state projected view of the importance of cultural inclusion and expression, as noted by the Soviets participation and signing of the accords. This contradicts Soviet’s actions within their own country. These two actions paralleled and contradicted each other with the repression of the dissident movement symbolizing state control of culture whereas the signing of the accord promised a movement towards the opening of cultural expression. These accords eventually became the “new framework and context for the expression of dissident voices” (New World Encyclopedia). Activists often set up groups to monitor and track violations by the Soviets against the accords to use against them (New World Encyclopedia).
This post was awarded the Comrade’s Corner Award
CONFERENCE ON SECURITY AND CO-OPERATION IN EUROPE FINAL ACT, 1975, Retrieved from http://www.osce.org/helsinki-final-act?download=true
Helsinki Accords. (n.d.). Retrieved April 21, 2017, from http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Helsinki_Accords
Pankin. (1975). After the Forum in Helsinki: COMPONENTS OF CULTURAL EXCHANGES. The Current Digest of Russian Press, Vol. 27, 37. Retrieved from https://dlib-eastview-com.ezproxy.lib.vt.edu/browse/doc/13638377
The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica. (2012, April 10). Helsinki Accords. Retrieved April 21, 2017, from https://www.britannica.com/event/Helsinki-Accords’
US Department of State. (n.d.). Helsinki Final Act, 1975. Retrieved April 21, 2017, from https://history.state.gov/milestones/1969-1976/helsinki
Von Geldern, J. (2015, September 01). The Dissident Movement. Retrieved April 21, 2017, from http://soviethistory.msu.edu/1973-2/the-dissident-movement/
5 thoughts on “Cultural Contradiction”
Great post! I didn’t know of this accord before and what affect it had on the dissident movement. I, like Maddie, am not at all suppressed that they didn’t live up to the standards of the accords and would wonder how other states reacted or if they even cared. I also found the last sentence interesting and am sure there is some great opportunities of interesting research for how the members of the dissident movement would monitor and track these violations. It is such an interesting concept that this movement was marked by the Soviet’s inability to follow the accords and how they used that against them and built evidence.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maddie has some good questions for you! I also found this post really interesting. Thanks for writing about the Helsinki Accords, which were so important to the emergence of the dissident movement and the cultural Cold War of the last Soviet period. The article you found in the Current Digest is especially noteworthy, as it documents an important (and sometimes neglected) aspect of the agreements involving copyright. Before 1975 most western countries did not regard books published in the Soviet Union has having the same copyright protection as books published in the west did. Signing the Helsinki Accord allowed the Soviets to claim international copyright for works published by Soviet citizens. You can see this as either 1) protecting intellectual property or 2) another censorship lever.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Soviet participation in the Helsinki Accords and the aftermath is an interesting example of how these international agreements often lack an enforcement mechanism. You highlight some of the interesting contradictions such as regulation of expression that led to the emergence of the dissident movement, but historically, it’s not surprising that the state said one thing and did another. Great post!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I found this blog and how you outlined the Soviet Union’s contradiction to be really interesting. When I first started reading your blog I was surprised that the Soviet Union was apart of the Helsinki Accords and agreed to sign it. As I continued to read your blog it was not a shock that they did not keep up to the agreement, specifically human rights for their citizens. While you were researching did you find anything on how the other countries responded to the Soviets not following along with the Helsinki Accords? Or were there any other countries who also restrained their people from the human rights addressed in the Helsinki Accords? Super interesting blog, great job!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It does look like many other countries failed to live up to the Helsinki standards and there are many reports discussing the violations.